For many I am a GUARDIAN ANGLE, which happens also to be our family crest for over 1000 years.
This website is limited in publications and for this my blog at http://au.360.yahoo.com/profile-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_QHprovides material also. However, this website allows those interested in pursing their constitutional and other legal rights to purchase books (see below) and/or make a donation.
Since federation many soldiers gave their lives to protect the democratic system in the Commonwealth of Australia only for politicians to rob us anyhow of so much in their ever ongoing quest to get more powers.
I have taken on this cause in using the legal provisions (including the Constitution) to our benefit and to expose the abuse and misuse of powers by lawyers/judges/politicians, etc, and others who may seek to assist in thee way best suitable to them are welcome to do so
This web page is merely, so to say, a kind of introduction as my many books already set out matters extensively.
Those who do not have a PayPal account but still wish to purchase one of more books they can still use PayPal if they have a MasterCard, etc, and in the alternative forward a cheque as payment. See details below.
.
"
INCEST" allegations! .
Was the subsequent
ARREST lawful? .
Or, is it a case of
kidnapping,
unlawful imprisonment, etc?
.
No matter what allegations are made against your person and regardless if they have any truth in them or not the moment you are "ARRESTED" it will be forever on your records. You will have to disclose it whenever seeking to apply for a position (job) and more then likely when joining clubs, etc.
.
Worse is when you know you are innocent of whatever is alleged against you.
.
Not only should you concern yourself as to if the allegations are true or not but also if the police had "reasonable grounds" to arrest you! After all the harm often is far greater from having been "arrested" then allegations which may be for some people easily being shown to be fabricated or being misconceived allegations.
.
This book also underlines that the Police must prove the arrest was lawful and if you do not accept this then they, not you, have to obtain a judicial decision (Court decision) to validate the arrest, failing that it was and remains to have been an unlawful arrest, and may constitute kidnapping, false imprisonment and other unlawful conduct perpetrated by the police against your person!
.
Every (step) parent can on day face to be accused of having committed INCEST, which generally will leave a person, not matter how innocent marked for life.
.
When arrested on 9 January 2008 rather then to struggle for my right of freedom of movement I held it better to under force of the police using their arrest powers to cooperate and then later exercise my right to pursue investigations in what I consider grave abuse of powers by the police and unlawful conduct by them, including an unlawful arrest.
.
I started to make my complaints on 9 January 2008, which can be known from the taped interview as to objecting to my finger prints being used for any purposes, and my 10 January 2008 writings further accentuated this followed up with further writings. The police could have therefore resolved matters simply by making an application to the Courts to seek to validate the arrest, the questioning the finger print taking and the usage of the details/information and show to the Court that it had "reasonable grounds" as required by the Act, and then it would have been for me to express to the Court my opposition for the Court to do so.
.
For purpose of this book it is not relevant what the final outcome is of the case as what the book (book print and CD version) is about its to expose the what I consider unlawful conduct by the police;
A book on CD about exposing fabricated allegations ($ 30.00 plus P&H)
ISBN 978-0-9803712-3-9
.
The CD version will have more material because the print version will be limited due to the amount of pages available. Compilation of the first edition has been completed and in that regard publication can take place at any time once the book set out has been completed, albeit there has already been publications of Chapters, etc, on the Internet. Subsequent editions can publish any further developments that may occur.
.
Anyone, regardless of the reason you might be arrested for, who desires to know how to go about challenging the police about an arrest may find that the book does give valuable explanations as to when an arrest can be deemed lawful, and it certainly is not up to the police to ultimately decide that! Read the book to discover how the Author, so to say, turn the table onto the police and use the legal provisions against them! This book is not intended to provide legal advice as the Author recognise that every allegation and every arrest is unique pending upon"the whole of the surrounding circumstances" existing at the time.
.
Below is indicated how you can order a copy of any book. Best is that if you order a book to forward also an email to inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au to notify of it and in the heading state; "Re BOOK ORDER" This as to seek to keep delivery time to a minimum.
Book versions expected to be available from late February 2008.
Pre-ordering available.
BANANA REPUBLIC OF AUSTRALIA
Date:
Tue, 6 Nov 2007 01:30:05 +1100 (EST)
From:
"Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka" <inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au> Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by yahoo.com.au.
Subject:
BOYCOTT purported 2007 federal election
To:
info@aec.gov.au
CC:
inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
YES, WE KINDLY ACCEPT DONATIONS
Since 1982, I have conducted a special LIFELINE SERVICE under the slogan MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®, which at times also assisted people in their Court litigation. See also some of it set out below.
Since 2001 the ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HALVKA MIE AUST CPENG began to provide financial support, as until then I had to do so, often resulting in borrowing moneys from the bank to fund this. Since then, MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® has embarked upon the huge project to return constitutional rights to the people, exposing the abuse by politicians and judges alike to bit by bit rob Australians of their constitutional rights. We accept any financial support/donations, etc anyone wish to provide where in particular those for whatever reason not being able themselves to embark upon this hard work in research, etc, can nevertheless in their own way, by financial contribution support or otherwise assist this cause. In spirit of the Constitution, we do not seek to take any position in regard of political parties and/or the religion of any person. Our platform is that all people should be equal among their fellowman/woman, in the circumstances prevailing. We pursue the creation of an OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, a constitutional council that advises the Government, the People, the Parliament and the Courts as to constitutional powers and limitations without any political bias. By this, we pursue that no longer a person having to forgo JUSTICE because of the huge cost to litigate a constitutional issues that might be a obstacle in litigation, but the OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN being able to pursue this apart of what any person may desire to do personally. No longer politicians hiding behind lawyers, using taxpayers monies, to defeat innocent people, as we pursue JUSTICE for all. Some people are good in certain skills and some people in other skills, and why not do what you are best in and provide us the financial support to do what we have done for so long. Those who have faced the court may know how terrifying the experiences can be, and I created in 1985 the document "ADDRESS TO THE COURT", that since has been for more then 25 years used in all Court levels including civil and criminal trials. It is where the Defendant can set out his/her case to be heard by the Court without the judge being able to prevent the Defendant to do so, as too often occurs with unrepresented Defendants.
See also the 1-11-2003 published book;
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & ADDRESS TO THE COURT
A book on CD, making litigation a more level playing field
ISBN 0-9580569-7-8 (After 1-1-2007; ISBN 978-0-9580569-7-7
Those who desire to have mention in any further book publication(s) his/her making of a donation may indicate so when making a donation and state if their amount of donation is to be included or not upon which the publisher considers what would be most appropriate. The person may forward an email to any change in this and we seek to provide for the intentions of any donor. As a donor you do what you are best in and we do our best in fighting for our (the general community) constitutional rights, justice, "civil rights", "human rights", etc.
On behalf of all those who directly and/or indirectly may benefit from your donation I thank you. Please note that corporate sponsorship is also welcome. Estate bequest are also welcome! Please note that the PayPal payment (PayPal also accepts credit card and VISA payments via email) is used so that the donors banking details remains confidential in every way, while it ensures accountability as to any monies donated. For those interested, the following book also sets out the ambition as to MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® as how it is anticipated to become global for the good of mankind; INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire-ORIGINAL EDITION
Crime/comedy novel on CD edition
(ISBN 0-9580569-1-9 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-1-5
There are also Personalized and Game (board game) editions available.
Please note that any DONATION (such as by way of a cheque) must be made out to;
THE ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE AUST CPENG (ABN 97144820620)
Cheques should be crossed and marked; "NOT NEGOTIABLE"
Please note; At the end of this page there is an ability to purchase copies of this and any other book on CD listed. Do note that Postage includes a postage charge applies within the Commonwealth of Australia via "Australia Post" (including its agents Australia Post may engage). When placing an order, you may having placed the order forward an additional email to inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au as a special notification, however this is not required if you do not desire to do so. It is important to provide all relevant details as to postal address for delivery when placing the order(s).
From:
"Evan Whitton"
To:
"Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka"
Subject:
for your files
Date:
Thu, 24 May 2007 13:06:15 +1000
Please note; DUE TO OUTGOING AND INCOMING EMAILS BEING BLOCKED I HAVE A TEMPORARY ALTERNATIVE EMAIL ADDRESS; inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
(No second guesses as to who might be blocking it.)
I SUCCEEDED IN THE APPEALS against convictions of “FAILING TO VOTE”!
Again;
I SUCCEEDED IN THE APPEALS against convictions of “FAILING TO VOTE”!
This page is dedicated to the late JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE Aust CP Eng and to my wife Mrs Olga HLAVKA-SCHOREL.
As Author, creator, and publisher, of the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® book on CD series I pursue JUSTICE for all.
"Our lives are worthless without another human being there to share it with. Therefore, we ought to look after each human being as we do after ourselves."
By; G. H. SCHOREL-HLAVKA 6-8-2003
The National Library of Australia (Canberra) and the State Library of Victoria are keeping copies of published books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® book on CD series!
Thousands upon thousands Australians are wrongfully denied to stand as candidates in Federal elections, the Author in
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on CITIZENSHIP. A book on CD about Australians unduly harmed, exposes how unconstitutional this is.
Likewise about the 1967 con job referendum that with subsequent legislation in regard of Aboriginals caused them all to loose their citizenship
AND A HOST OF OTHER ISSUES ARE CANVASSED BY THE AUTHOR! See also
The crime/comedy novel that was written without any prior set out as to the plot. In time this INSPECTOR-RIKATI@ is intended to fight for JUSTICE for all, in the various cases. The about 700 page script is intended to be used for a movie also.
Was the High Court of Australia using KANGAROO COURT and STAR CHAMBER COURT proceedings?
Read the 3 October 2003 transcript and consider how on earth the High Court of Australia can override constitutional tights of Appeal in regard of an application for orders Mandamus/Prohibition.
Consider that the judges hearing the case were objected against, but they never ruled upon it.
Consider that I objected to the hearing to proceed, due to non service, but the Court proceeded anyhow without making a formal ruling to dismiss my objection.
Consider also that an application for orders Mandamus/Prohibition has got absolutely nothing to do with either Section 383 or section 353 of the Australian Electoral Act 1918! In fact, even without the existence of those sections, I would have had a right of appeal, in regard of the refusal of Marshall J to hear and determine my applications for orders Mandamus/Prohibition.
Transcript 3-10-2003;QUOTEMR HANKS: That is so, your Honour. I take it that your Honours have some understanding of the background to this matter. GUMMOW J: Yes, we do.END QUOTE
Well, it turned out the judges obviously didn’t know the case at all, as they never evern were aware that the ADDRESS TO THE COURT extensively addressed the issue that no NOTICE OF MOTION was served!
Consider also that Mr Peter Hanks QC was yet again deceiving the Court;
Transcript 3-10-2003QUOTE MR SCHOREL-HLAVKA: If I may, your Honour, my name is Gerrit Hendrik Schorel-Hlavka and I am coming here under objection on the basis that I was not served with a notice of motion, and I have indicated that that notice of motion was defective. It had no hearing date. I do not believe it is up to the Registrar of the Court supposedly serving it by simply giving a hearing date. GUMMOW J: Yes. What do you say about that, Mr Hanks? MR HANKS: My instructions are that the notice of motion was served. I have not heard any objection to the competency of today’s hearing on that basis, your Honour, to this point. GUMMOW J: Could you prove service? END QUOTE
Again;MR HANKS: My instructions are that the notice of motion was served. I have not heard any objection to the competency of today’s hearing on that basis, your Honour, to this point.
This, even so since 15-4-2003 I made known, in writing, to the Deputy Registrar of the High Court of Australia in numerous correspondence that I had not been served!
So, for about 6 months I kept complaining about not having been served with documents, and nevertheless was forced to file a response, by 6 May 2003, to a NOTICE OF MOTION, of which the content was unaware to me, indeed, it was refused to be provided to me. Then, on 19 August 2003, a copy, without hearing date, then as part of a 317 pages Appealbooks was provided And so, after the case to file in the Court, and Appealbooks were completed, then finally I was entitled to know what the case actually was about!
No one in their right mind could accept this to be proper conduct.
Why did the Deputy Registrar (An OFFICER OF THE COURT!), sitting in the Court, before the judges, keep her mouth shut, well aware that the barrister Mr Peter Hanks QC (another OFFICER OF THE COURT) was making FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS, and by this misleading the Court, and so perverting the course of justice, as she knew that all along I had disputed service!
Why indeed, did she allow the proceedings to go ahead in the first place, knowing the documents hadn't been served?
To me, this were the kind of proceedings that I consider to be KANGAROO COURT proceedings, where a Court sits without having lawfully invoked its jurisdiction, having failed to formally dismiss first the OBJECTION TO ITS LEGAL JURISDICTION, and where the proceedings are of the kind of that of the outlawed STAR CHAMBER COURT, where irrespective of the case before the Court the case would be prevented to continue.
When judges imply that they can overrule constitutional rights, then one ought to have concern for the sanity of those judges, at least that is my view.
Again;MR HANKS: My instructions are that the notice of motion was served. I have not heard any objection to the competency of today’s hearing on that basis, your Honour, to this point.
How can a barrister, representing his client claim to be unaware of it where some 6 months of correspondence related to there not having been any service and the ADDRESS TO THE COURT contained some 13 odd pages commencing after the heading of the document, outlining that there was never any proper service?
In fact, there was never even an appearance filed in 2001!
If you think I feel being SCREWED, then you are darn right.
I view this is TREASON, by the judges, as to allow an unconstitutional Government and so also Members of Parliament to continue.
Just one thing. Judges can prevent the cases to be heard upon their MERITS, but as the framers made clear that once a challenge is made, then it is ULTRA VIRES until the Court decides otherwise. As such, railroading a case is not defeating my challenge. It merely means the challenge remains ON FOOT until one day it finally is being heard.
It means that every further election will also be NULL AND VOID.
As is with a Court order that is without legal jurisdiction, every subsequent Court order will also be without legal jurisdiction and be NULL AND VOID.
Likewise therefore, where the purported 2001 federal election was null and void, then the High Court of Australia has not resolved the case refusing to hear the case upon its MERITS, but rather made a further havoc of the legal processes.
This is why we need an OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, where without political interference and incompetent judges we can have a legal redress to the grievances of those who are denied their constitutional rights.
We can do well without incompetent High Court judges, who don’t even understand what Australian citizenship really is about.
I admit freely that I am not a lawyer, and so not brainwashed to believe some utter nonsense. I seek no more but that every Australian is given his/her legal rights as provided for within the ambit of the Commonwealth of Australian Constitution Act 1900 (UK)!
Read documents such as "The Constitution is a PERPETUAL LEASE", "The Great Deception" and other documents to become aware how collectively parliamentarians and judges of the High Court of Australia have robbed us of our constitutional rights by substituting the Constitution with a fake Constitution! A must to read!
On 19 July 2006 the County Court of Victoria ordered that my appeals would be allowed and the convictions of 17 November 2005 by the Magistrates Court of Victoria at Heidelberg were set aside and the charges for FAILING TO VOTE in the 2001 and 2004 (purported) federal elections were struck out.This as I maintained that the writs of the purported 10 November 2001 federal election were defective and so the purported election was without legal force and John Howard and his cronies were in fact not elected at all. I also made clear that the Framers of the Constitution refused to make voting compulsory and therefore it was unconstitutional to force anyone to vote in federal elections. Further, one of the issues I raised was that the right of “religious” objection voting would be unconstitutional unless it included “secular” objections.
Further, I pursued also that there is no such thing as an “Australian nationality” as we are and remain British nationals.
All constitutional issues raised by me in the 5-year legal battle were and remained unchallenged!
There was a lot more to it, as I have set out in my most recent 6-7-2006 published book;
Some of the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series (published or intended to be published)
A book on CD, making litigation a more level playing field
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable)
(ISBN 0-9580569-7-8) After 1-1-2007; ISBN 978-0-9580569-7-7
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book includes examples of the usage of the ADDRESS TO THE COURT where a unrepresented party can still present a well set out case before the Court, and avoiding the judicial officer (Judge, etc) to prevent the unrepresented party to appropriately pursue his/her case.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & ADDRESS TO THE COURT 2nd Edition (check if available)
A book on CD, making litigation a more level playing field
RRP $55.00 + PH charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-5-6 was prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-5-4
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book is an updated version and includes examples of the usage of the ADDRESS TO THE COURT where a unrepresented party can still present a well set out case before the Court, and avoiding the judicial officer (Judge, etc) to prevent the unrepresented party to appropriately pursue his/her case.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & High Court as STAR CHAMBER COURT (check if available)
A book on CD about irregular proceedings
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-9-4 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-9-1
Brief set out of some main issues;
The Author in this book sets out how the High Court of Australia rather then operating as a Court of law ends up operating as a STAR CHAMBER COURT, using the transcript of proceedings to underline this.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & High Court of Australia as KANGAROO COURT (check if available)
A book on CD as to improper legal proceedings RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-8-6 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-8-4
Brief set out of some main issues;
The Author in this book sets out how the High Court of Australia rather then operating as a Court of law ends up operating as a KANGAROO COURT, using the transcript of proceedings to underline this.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & How to lawfully avoid voting (Book)
A book about Australia’s federal election issues & rights
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-3-X prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-3-0
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book has limited material in it as it does not have the extensive material as is on the CD version. However, in itself is still very good reading and does set out certain matters. It is a Black & White version of the book itself albeit the additional pages are to some extend also in colour.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & How to Lawfully Avoid Voting (Book-Colour) (check if available)
A Book about Australia's Federal Election Issues & Rights
RRP $50.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 978-0-9751760-9-2
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book has limited material in it as it does not have the extensive material as is on the CD version. However, in itself is still very good reading and does set out certain matters. The usage of colour in some of the text of the book as to bring out certain statements makes it unique in that regard.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & How to lawfully avoid voting (CD)
A book on CD about Australia’s federal election issues & rights
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable (ISBN 0-9751760-4-8 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-4-7)
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book includes the Court orders and other documents filed in the Court in the process of the Author succeeding in his quest that he was not legally required to vote. It includes the various documents filed in Court and the constitutional and other legal arguments used in the hearings over the 5-years that it was being litigated.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & There is no Government to go to war
A book on CD About Legal Issues Confronting Australia
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-5-1 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-5-3
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book sets out why there was no government to go to war. Let alone there was no constitutional authority to go to war! The Author goes into numerous constitutional and other legal details. The question being should John Howard and others involved in the unconstitutional war be held accountable before a Court of law for the mass murder, treason, treachery, human rights abuses, war crimes, and other offences!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really? (check if available)
A book in B&W on Australians political, religious & other rights RRP $50.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 978-0-9803712-0-8
Brief set out of some main issues;
While much is argued about "the Australia way of life" what should be attended to what is it constitutionally? After all, politicians can fabricate their own versions but surely what is relevant is what is constitutionally applicable. The author takes the reader on a journey and set out numerous issues. He attends to the religious and racial issues also.
This is a "Black and White" limited version which does not have all the material as included on the CD but still worth reading.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really? (check if available)
A book-colour on Australians political, religious & other rights
RRP $65.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 978-0-9803712-1-5
Brief set out of some main issues;
While much is argued about "the Australia way of life" what should be attended to what is it constitutionally? After all, politicians can fabricate their own versions but surely what is relevant is what is constitutionally applicable. The author takes the reader on a journey and set out numerous issues. He attends to the religious and racial issues also.
This is a version that has certain text in colour as to bring out the statements and which does not have all the material as included on the CD but still worth reading.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really?
A book on CD on Australians political, religious & other rights
RRP $200.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 0-9751760-2-1 (prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-2-3
Brief set out of some main issues;
While much is argued about "the Australia way of life" what should be attended to what is it constitutionally? After all, politicians can fabricate their own versions but surely what is relevant is what is constitutionally applicable. The author takes the reader on a journey and set out numerous issues. He attends to the religious and racial issues also.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the BANANA REPUBLIC AUSTRALIA
Dictatorship & deaths by stealth- Preliminary book edition on CD
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-3-5 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-3-9
Brief set out of some main issues;
The author in this book sets out how the Commonwealth of Australia is really no more then a Banana Republic. Read also as to what was going on and how people were concerned by the actions of the Federal Government.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire (check if available)
Personalized crime/comedy novel on CD edition
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-0-0 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-0-8
Brief set out of some main issues;
Read the extraordinary events that involves INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and his fellow travellers through the journey of comedy and crime and the twist ending finish. A book you wish to read over time and again.
Will Martina be able to stay a virgin or will she be seduced and so by whom? This is a crime/comedy where the Author has published the book in versions where a person can have his/her name inserted instead of a certain character, just that it cannot be INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, as his name is excluded as such. But, would it not be nice to have a book with your own name as a character?
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire, GAME EDITION
Crime/comedy novel on CD edition RRP $20.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-2-7 Prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-2-2
Brief set out of some main issues;
Read the extraordinary events that involves INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and his fellow travellers through the journey of comedy and crime and the twist ending finish. A book you wish to read over time and again. Will Martina be able to stay a virgin or will she be seduced and so by whom? This is a version of the book where the board game is included. The board game is based upon the events of the book. The board game is unique as you can play it time and again and yet never know how you are going to end up in the game.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire-ORIGINAL EDITION
Crime/comedy novel on CD edition
RRP $15.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-1-9 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-1-5
Brief set out of some main issues;
Read the extraordinary events that involves INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and his fellow travellers through the journey of comedy and crime and the twist ending finish. A book you wish to read over time and again. Will Martina be able to stay a virgin or will she be seduced and so by whom?
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-6-X prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-6-0
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book goes in detail as to "CITIZENSHIP" and exposes some of the rot fed to the public by the Federal Government.It exposes that the lack of "CITIZENSHIP" affects all lawyers/judges/politicians, etc.
A book on CD about ELECTORAL AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHTS
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-1-3 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-1-6
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book goes in detail as to "CITIZENSHIP" and exposes some of the rot fed to the public by the Federal Government, as well as addresses the issue of electoral matters
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-0-5 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-0-9
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book includes the submissions made to the Crime and Misconduct commission, but somehow were seemingly left out by the CMC. The Author provides the evidence it was received, and wonders was this to avoid exposing Queensland Premier Peter Beattie, through the Government lawyers, having perhaps concealed from the Courts relevant material in the Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge litigation. It includes the 1-9-2003 correspondence that so much spilled out why the convictions were legally floored as the Queensland Court of Criminal Appeal subsequently used to overturn the convictions.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on the battle SCHOREL-HLAVKA v BLACKSHIRTS
For the quest of JUSTICE, in different ways. Book on CD.
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-4-3 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-4-6
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book is where it is the Author versus the BLACKSHIRTS and his involvement in court litigation. The Reader can explore what goes on in regard of the leader of the BLACKSHIRTS Mr. John Murray Abbott and some of other BLACKSHIRTS as well as police and lawyers involved. A behind the scene look with copies of court documents included, including transcripts of hearings. Look at what the Author achieved over a 13 year period versus the BLACKSHIRTS!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on IR WorkChoices Legislation (Book-CD)
A Book about the Validity of the High Courts 14-11-2006 Decision
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable).
ISBN 978-0-9751760-6-1
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book takes a critical look upon the 14-11-2006 judgment and how the Author exposes the High Court of Australia having failed to balance its statements in a proper manner, basically cherry picking what they used, rather then providing balanced judgments that consider all relevant details, as well as to how lawyers appeared to conceal relevant matters from the Court. The Author pursues that the Amendment Act (WorkChoices legislation) is and remains unconstitutional. The book also sets out why he published the book on the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal DOOMSDAY on 27 May 2007!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on IR WorkChoices Legislation (Book-B&W) (check if available)
A Book about the Validity of the High Courts 14-11-2006 Decision
RRP $35.00 + P&H charges (where applicable)
ISBN 978-0-9751760-7-8
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book takes a critical look upon the 14-11-2006 judgment and how the Author exposes the High Court of Australia having failed to balance its statements in a proper manner, basically cherry picking what they used, rather then providing balanced judgments that consider all relevant details, as well as to how lawyers appeared to conceal relevant matters from the Court. The Author pursues that the Amendment Act (WorkChoices legislation) is and remains unconstitutional. The book also sets out why he published the book on the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal DOOMSDAY on 27 May 2007! However, this Black & White issue is limited in material versus the CD issue.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on IR WorkChoices Legislation (Book-Colour) (check if available)
A Book about the Validity of the High Courts 14-11-2006 Decision
RRP $50.00 + P&H charges (where applicable)
ISBN 978-0-9751760-8-5
This book takes a critical look upon the 14-11-2006 judgment and how the Author exposes the High Court of Australia having failed to balance its statements in a proper manner, basically cherry picking what they used, rather then providing balanced judgments that consider all relevant details, as well as to how lawyers appeared to conceal relevant matters from the Court. The Author pursues that the Amendment Act (WorkChoices legislation) is and remains unconstitutional. The book also sets out why he published the book on the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal DOOMSDAY on 27 May 2007! However, this is a colour version where certain statements are quoted in colours as to highlight them, albeit it is a limited version in material versus the CD issue.
: Postage & Handling (P&H) charges varies pending number of items, weight, size, manner of packing, manner of posting, eg, ordinary mail, secure mail, express mail, also destination, etc.Roughly, within the Commonwealth of Australia only, for a printed books to be forwarded by Australia Post is estimated a $12.00 P&H charge is to be added. For a book on CD to be forwarded by Australia Post is $7.00 P&H charge is to be added
Overseas deliveries P&H charges are to be determine differently, as rates varies considerably.
Do keep in mind that those marked with (check if available) may require a long delivery time period.
Unless payments have been received {including cheque(s) having been cleared} no items will be send out. For delivery times you may contact the publisher.
Please note that any payments (such as a cheque) must be made to (including PayPal account);
THE ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE AUST CPENG
(ABN 97144820620)
Cheques should be crossed and marked; "NOT NEGOTIABLE"Email to;
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® for THE ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE AUST CPENG publish INSPECTOR-RIKATI® books by Author Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka.
Please note, that special postal rates may apply where multiple order is placed, which may allow for a credit/refund, subject to the determination of the Publisher. Please note, that for postal addresses outside the Commonwealth of Australia the goods may attract higher postal charges and/or any other charges that the relevant Authorities may apply and obviously are to be paid at the time of the order being placed and/or prior to shipment. Hence, any prospective purchaser may inquire by email to the Publisher as to relevant postal charges in such cases. Any book on CD/DVD are for use with Computer using Microsoft Word, and are not music or playable CD's?DVD"s!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really?
A book on CD on Australians political, religious & other rights
ISBN 978-0-9751760-2-3 was ISBN 0-9751760-2-1
The books publication became the center piece in the appeals to cause it to succeed!
If John Howard and his cronies were not elected in 2001 & 2004 then what is he and the others doing in Parliament and in Government one may ask.
Let have them charged with relevant criminal offences, so they experience what it is to face court and where applicable face the conseuqneces of convictions!
Don't be a “GUTLESS WONDER” and/or “ARSELICKER” but be a real Australian and stand up for your constitutional and other legal rights. Have Members of Parliament charged in regard of any crimes they have committed. Use the federal election as a non-confident vote and kick them out, so that they get the message we the people do not take it any more. If you desire to vote, I urge you to vote first for INDEPENDENTS. Apply the new Industrial Relations provisions to Members of Parliament, and rob them also of any unions (political parties)!
YOUR ATTENTION, PLEASE? “PEOPLES POWER reclaim our State and Federal constitutional and other legal rights, and hold politicians & judges accountable!” Mr . G. H. Schorel-Hlavka 6-7-2006 WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Phone 02 6283 3533 Fax02 6281 3760Re; CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, etc.
Sir,AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I for one wonder if you are a “GUTLESS WONDER” and/or “ARSELICKER” to allow John Howard to continue his conduct to prostitute and otherwise abuse/misuse the Constitution?
On 19 July 2006, after a 5-year legal battle, I succeeded in my appeal with all constitutional issues I raised remaining UNCHALLENGED by the Federal Government lawyers. They were totally defeated by me. I view that anyone who does not stand up to fight as to protect constitutional provisions and limitations is at the very least a “GUTLESS WONDER”.
It is bad enough that John Howard unconstitutionally authorised the armed murderous invasion into Afghanistan and Iraq, but it seems slowly he is performing the duties of Governor-General and taking over prerogative powers by stealth.
The latest was to announce on 23-1-2007 that he had decided to change Departments, etc.
Excuse me, as Governor-General you should at the very least be aware what prerogative powers are and that it is the Governor-General who decides what Department are to be created and which persons will be appointed as Ministers of the Crown. Sure, it might be on advise of a Minister, but in the end it is the Governor-General as the Executive officer of the Commonwealth of Australia representing Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II who during the absenteeism of Her Majesty fulfil those duties of prerogative powers.
We now have a news report that high-ranking officers may be placed on some kind of performance employment, so they operate within budget. As Commander in Chief, is that meaning you should be sacked for allowing Australian troops to go unconstitutionally into Iraq, by this wasting taxpayer’s monies? Surely, kind of grab of power over the military should be prevented? The Framers of the Constitution didn’t want the armed forces to be under direct control of the Government of the Day, as they were concerned that some Jack-in-office could take troops to war for political reasons. Now, we know now that is precisely with the invasion into Iraq. Proving the Framers of the Constitution were very wise to leave this power over the military in the hands of the Commander in Chief, being the Governor-General who then if advised by the Minister of Defence to declare war, first must consider if this in the interest of the GENERAL COMMUNITY, and if the Governor-General concludes it is not in the interest of the GENERAL COMMUNITY then he is decline to publish in the Gazette a DECLARATION OF WAR. Hence, a Governor-General who then find that a Minister nevertheless authorises Australian troops to invade another “friendly” nation in breach of Section 24AA of the Crimes Act (Cth) has no alternative but to take away the commission of any Minister who acts unconstitutionally/illegally and ensures that the person(s) is charged with any relevant crimes. In my view, where a Governor-General fails to take appropriate action he then may be guilty of crimes himself by allowing unconstitutional/illegal conduct to continue. A Governor-General isn’t there just to pocket some money and, so to say, the hell with the Constitution, the Monarchy and legal principles, the Governor-General is there to ensure that no one is above the Constitution and neither above the law.
We have John Howard now seemingly getting involved with a religious party. Albeit I do not want to portray Muslims as deviants, as to the contrary it does not require to have a certain religion to be some tyrant, but lest for this example take Muslims as an example.
Despite the Framers of the Constitution having made clear that there would be a total prohibition by the Commonwealth of Australia as to religion, not just Section 116 prohibitions, nevertheless we have incompetent High Court of Australia judges making rulings about religious school funding. It underlines that no person should be appointed as judge to the High Court of Australia unless having had a proper education in constitutional issues and have a competence in constitutional issues, and not as occurred already a judge having been appointed then declines to hand down a judgment because of not knowing constitutional issues. As a Governor-General is the one to appoint a person as a judge to the High Court of Australia (not the Government of the Day) then the Governor-General must at the very least ensure he appoints a person who has competence and not go with perhaps political appointments.
While for now the High Court of Australia has (albeit ill conceived) allowed funding for religious education, and John Howard is all about Christian values, etc. Even as I understand it inciting Muslims to take action against an outspoken Sheik, seemingly for daring to use his right of FREE SPEECH, the problem we are facing is that if eventually enough Muslims are in the Government then they can use the very ill conceived judgments and other conduct to turn this country into a Muslim doctrine kind of nation! No good then to argue that it is unconstitutional as after all the Governor-General, the Chief Executive Officer has allowed it to be done against Muslims, and so why not, so to say, turn the tide. This is the very danger we are heading for! Once you allow a (purported) Prime Minister to abuse and misuse constitutional provisions then you and only you can be ultimately responsible for allowing this to continue.
I understand that a Governor-General now has a cosy arrangement with a Government of the Day, in having financial benefits that are unconstitutional. As Governor-General you are employed in the services of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and no other. You are not employed by the Commonwealth of Australia and cannot draw from Consolidated Revenue any funds now or after retirement regarding the Office of Governor-General. If you were to draw later benefits as such you may find to commit crimes to defraud the Commonwealth of Australia, as regardless what legislation is in place to purportedly provide for financial benefits, ultimately the Federal Parliament has no legislative powers to override the Constitution!
By now you had ample of time to educate yourself about the role of being a Governor-General and what the Framers of the Constitution intended as such, and either you act as such or resign and let someone more competent fulfil the duties of Governor-General, as is appropriate in the circumstances. I again recommend the creation of the OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, a constitutional council, to advise about constitutional powers and limitations, before it is too late!
I wonder if you are just a “GUTLESS WONDER” and/or “ARSELICKER”.
Awaiting your response, G. H. SCHOREL-HLAVKA
Our youth of today are growing up with disrespect, as politicians are showing that it is all right to lie, to be deceitful, to murder innocent civilians. They just do it under the cover that we are being or might be attacked. Yes, it are the “TERRORIST” as they will make clear to anyone. Really? So, they bread by this home grown terrorism. It is for this we should hold parliamentarians who ignore the RULE OF LAW accountable. They must face the Courts for any crimes they commit. "Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a facist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they're being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country." Hermann Goering, Hitlers' Reich-Marshall, at the Nuremberg trials after WW2. Apply the Industrial Relations laws John Howard used against the people against the Politicians. Throw the political parties out of the government and vote for independents who will abide the law. Not unless the people take back their constitutional and other rights will we stop this rot. If we don’t do it then some day others (who do not agree with our Government) may do it for us by invading the Commonwealth of Australia as we did to Afghanistan and Iraq! John Howard now seems to have the grandeur of being a Head of State, he never was and never will be. No Prime Minister is a Head of State! He is not even constitutionally validly elected. He is an imposter and a criminal and should never be allowed to represent peace loving law abiding Australians. Remember the 88 Australians killed in the Bali bombing, well didn’t John Howard declare a “WAR ON TERROR”? He didn’t declare a war against some country, neither has the constitutional powers to do so, no, he declared war against INDIVIDUALS, and so they in turn responded in kind to kill Australians in large numbers. They merely responded in kind by John Howard having declared a war on them. If you do not accept the nonsense to declare a war on INDIVIDUALS, and neither should you, then lets stop those politicians from ransacking our moral values, and kick them out of the parliament so we can get appropriate representation by honest hardworking politicians who are not interested in party politics above the safety and wellbeing of Australians. Who are the (constitutional) terrorist, you may ask, well John Howard and his cohorts! We should not so much fear terror from outside Australia rather fear the terrorism created within Australia because of the conduct of politicians, showing a bad example that their kind of authorizing killings of innocent civilians is justified. The youth then respond in kind. Don’t blame the youth of today but the politicians, who are willing to sow fear amongst the general community to stay in power at all cost. Fool you who believe that Afghanistan re-introduction to stone women to death, and Iraq introduction of hanging, is somehow for the better security of Australians. Do not overlook the ongoing torture by soldiers of the Coalition of the Willing acting in our name! Lets stop that rot! Oppose any kind of execution! Oppose Any kind of violence! Lets return to the Australian RULE OF LAW!
VOTE FOR PEACE By Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka 15-1-2007
QUOTE Chapter 050 * Gary, what is this about political credibiility ?
**#** INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, the email I received indicates that the Federal Members of Parliament have the following related to them;
36 have been accused of spousal abuse.
7 have been arrested for fraud.
19 have been accused of writing bad checks
117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses.
3 have done time for assault
71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit.
14 have been arrested on drug-related charges.
8 have been arrested for shoplifting
21 currently are defendants in lawsuits.
84 have been arrested for drunk
* Moment, isn’t the Constitution prohibiting anyone being bankrupt from being a Member of Parliament?
**#** Actually the section 44 you refer to is as follows;
(iii) is an undischarged bankrupt or insolvent; or
and also then consider;
(ii) is attainted of treason, or has been convicted and is under sentence, or subject to be sentenced, for any offence punishable under the law of the Commonwealth or of a State by imprisonment for one year or longer; or
but the part to “bankrupt” refers to financially bankrupt not as I think you are considering to “moral bankrupt”.
* Well, aren’t John Howard and his cohorts morally bankrupt?
**#** Well, in my view they are but as a constitutionalist I have to go by what the intentions of the Framers were not what contemporary views are. It is bad enough that the High Court of Australia comes up with this contemporary view nonsense but reality is that like it or not we are bound by the intentions of the Framers.
* I understand Olga is upset about the execution of Saddam Hussein, isn’t she?
**#** To tell the truth, she just found out by a news bulletin that his body was ironically flown by a USA helicopter to his place of birth. She really is upset about his murder.
* Murder?
**#** Well, it hardly could be held to be otherwise. Saddam Hussein, as President of Iraq had constitutional immunity! John Howard and his fellow Coalition of the willing leading members Bush and Blair were eager to get rid of the national council when they invaded Iraq and by this prevented the only constitutional option to hold Saddam Hussein lawfully accountable, this as only the President could be placed on trial if the national council decided this was to be provided for. As such, then the trio overthrew the national council with their murderous armed invasion into an other sovereign nation (Iraq) they effectively prevented any lawful recourse to have him tried for alleged crimes. The Iraqi court that was merely a front for the Coalition of the Willing, as I see it to finally kill Saddam Hussein.
* But didn’t he get convicted for crimes against humanity?
**#** The point is, as the High Court of Australia itself has recognised, International law cannot override Australian constitutional provisions. The Framers of the Constitution made clear that International law could not override constitutional provisions! As such, where we as a Commonwealth of Australia have abolished the death penalty and were the occupiers of Iraq, then we had no right to hand over Saddam Hussein to his executioners or for that matter to a purported We have currently and will have in the future Australians facing the death penalty in other countries and we are morally bankrupt to argue that they cannot be executed if we having invaded Iraq allow them then to set up a system of executing people not just Saddam Hussein but also numerous others. That is the kind of law we have ensured to be put in place. How absurd is this. As the Dutch government made clear, when a USA national had illegally entered The Netherlands, they would not deport the person back to the USA unless the USA guaranteed it would not impose any death sentence upon the man even if convicted of murder, as the European Union Human Rights laws opposes the application of the death penalty.
As I have published already, the European Union Human rights Act also applies to the Commonwealth of Australia and for that matter to each and every State also, and as such I view John Howard placed himself above the law to ignore the rule of law and allow Saddam Hussein to be executed.
What was the justification to have Saddam Hussein executed one may ask? His argument about WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION hardly can have any credibility. The argument that Saddam Hussein was some tyrant hardly could be an issue, as Saddam Hussein was held by the US forces in custody. The death of Saddam Hussein served no purpose but for the perhaps personal satisfaction of Bush, Blair and Howard to get rid of a person they regarded as a nemesis We went to war killing indeed mass murdering civilians by the bombardments and for what? who afterwards proved to be without any direct harm to Australians. More people are being killed now then ever were during the time Saddam Hussein was president.
We are being told it will get better. Well, considering the introduction of the death penalty, the civil war that is going on , the way woman can’t safely going over the street, the kidnappings, etc, we are more likely facing far worse.
* What do you propose to do, if you had the position?
**#** Charge John Howard with treachery within Section 42AA of the Crimes Act (Cth) for invading a friendly country. For impersonating being a Prime Minister when constitutional he did not have this position at all. Charge him with treason for invading a country without due and proper authorisation as the Governor-General had never published in the Gazette a DECLARATION OF WAR to authorise Australian troops to invade either Afghanistan and/or Iraq. Charge all his supporters in the parliament who went along with this also as co-conspirators, etc. We are building this elaborate Detention Centre on Christmas Island and I think we have a good function for it to have parliamentarians experiences what it is to be held there.
* What about the Governor-General?
**#** I would see him and his predecessors as co conspirators and/or as being participants in it all because their duty was to stop a Minister of the Crown to act outside his/her constitutional powers. Therefore the Governor-General at the time of the occurrences must likewise be held legally accountable.
* Would you be willing to have John Howard handed over to Iraqi’s and face the death penalty there?
**#** Well, Olga might be rather pleased if that were to occur as she despises what he did, but I oppose the application of a death sentence and as such could not allow this even regarding John Howard.
* I understand you wrote to John Howard about a curse on his family if the execution of Saddam Hussein were to take place?
**#** I did, in that I stated he would put a curse on his family. I am not the person who does such a thing, but merely gave my view that he himself would do so. It simply is my guts feeling that he would subject his family to a curse and time will tell what this might be. I do not go around putting curses on people, I am not in that kind of business. My issue is the enforcement of constitutional and other relevant legal provisions and on 19 July 2006 I was successful in both appeals and not a single constitutional based objection I had placed before the Courts were being challenged by the government’s lawyers! I succeeded in all issues. Now, this included that John Howard was never constitutionally validly elected in 2001 and 2004.
* Are you saying he was never validly appointed as Prime Minister either?
**#** Well, within Section 64 of the Constitution the Governor-General can appoint anyone, even if not elected to the Federal Parliament as a Minister but only for up to three months.
I have also a beef with the High Court of Australia as it prevented unconstitutionally I may add my cases to be heard upon their MERITS and I have been vindicated by the 19 July 2006 successful appeals that I was right after all.
* Didn’t the High Court of Australia on 19 March 2003 also refuse to hear the application against Australian troops invading Iraq?
**#** That is correct, on the very day of the invasion they simply refused to allow the applications lodged with the Court to be heard and determined upon its MERITS.
* Were there others, such as Member of Parliament whop pursued legal action to prevent the Australian troops to unconstitutionally be involved in the armed invasion into Iraq?
**#** Not that I am aware of. I understand I was the only person to pursue through the legal processes to do so but the judges acted against this and the history of litigation before the Court was that the judges had their visit with the (then) Governor-General, who was a respondent in my case, and had a nice get together. I presume they went there to receive the instructions of the Governor-General how to railroad my case. After all, it is contrary to legal principles that any judge has a meeting with one of the parties concealed from the opponent. At the very least the judges should have advised me they were going to have a visit with tone of the Respondents, being the Governor-General and leave it up to me if I wanted to be present or not.
So, you view that the High Court of Australia acted inappropriate at times in your cases?
For the record it acted also as a KANGAROO COURT and a STAR CHAMBER COURT and I intend to publish books that will have the relevant details in them.
* Isn’t it CONTEMPT OF COURT if you attack the credibility of a Court?
**#** Not if you can show you are making claims without undue intentions. If I can show what is to me a reasonable cause to make those claims then I am entitled to make such claims.
* Surely the judges of the High Court of Australia would not abuse their powers, would they?
**#** In my view they did so and I view deliberately to railroad my cases. Just that they never may have expected that I all along contemplated they would do so and if you were to call it that way was setting a trap in that regard that if they did I could prove it.
* How?
**#** The transcript for one shows I made objections and indeed had them placed in writing and the Court rather then formally disposing of each and every objection simply ignored to do so. By this, it never did invoke legal jurisdiction. A Court must first formally hand down a judgment to dispose of any objections and give reason as to why it does so before it can invo
