For many I am a GUARDIAN ANGEL, which happens also to be our family crest for over 1000 years.
This is also temporary the website for;
OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN
(Don’t forget the hyphens!) Email: help@office-at-the-guardian.com . . Have you been the victim of a speeding measurement unit (laser, etc)? Then check out below as you may just been subjected to an unlawful authorised unit. Do not perceive that I seek to avoid lawbreakers to face the consequences of the law, but rather that I pursue that one can only be deemed a law breaker if once guilt is established in a proper manner and not by usage of unconstitutional legislative provisions! If therefore you were purportedly caught for speeding and even may lose your licence then you might find it worth to check out the 29-5-2009 email to Kevin Rudd PM quoted below and you know what, it cost you nothing to do so other then some of your time! .
This website is limited in publications and for this my blog at
http://au.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_QHprovides material also. However, this website allows those interested in pursuing their constitutional and other legal rights to purchase books and other items (see below) and/or make a donation (with an honourably membership subject to conditions).
Since federation many soldiers gave their lives to protect the democratic system in the Commonwealth of Australia only for politicians to rob us anyhow of so much in their ever ongoing quest to get more powers.
I have taken on this cause in using the legal provisions (including the Constitution) to our benefit and to expose the abuse and misuse of powers by lawyers/judges/politicians, etc, and others who may seek to assist in the way best suitable to them are welcome to do so
This web page is merely, so to say, a kind of introduction as my many books already set out matters extensively.
. ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCES;
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka 107 Graham Road, Viewbank 3084 Victoria, Australia Phone 03-94577209 (International 61394577209)
Those who do not have a PayPal account but still wish to purchase one of more books they can still use PayPal if they have a MasterCard, etc, and in the alternative forward a cheque as payment. See details below. .
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®
(Our name is our motto.)
.
Please note that when I stand as a candidate in an election, at my age, it is not trying to build on being elected for a future career rather that I seek to represent the real interest of electors, if elected.
. The only political part (then existing) I was ever a member of was the now defunct "The Age and Disability Pensions Party". . I oppose compulsory voting, and indeed succeeded in the County Court of Victoria on 19 July 2006 when I opposed to be compelled to vote. I am not against voting but against compulsory voting. . I am also against the so called "deposit" to be able to nominate as a candidate in an election, as I view anyone, regardless of financial position, as such also the poor should be able to stand as a candidate in an election. . QUOTE 29 May 2009 email
Contact your PM: your message was successfully submitted [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Friday, 29 May, 2009 4:40 PM
From:
"autoreply@pm.gov.au"
To:
inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
Contact your Prime Minister --------------------------- Thank you for your message to the Prime Minister.
Below is a copy of your comments to the Prime Minister for your records.
If you have supplied a postal address, a reply may be sent to you via Australia Post. Your message may also be forwarded to other Federal Ministers for their consideration.
This is an automatically generated email. Please do not reply to this email as this address is not monitored. If you have any problems with this service please contact the Web Administrator through the site feedback service at www.pm.gov.au/feedback/
--------------------- Copy of your comments ------------------------
Postal Address: 107 Graham Road Viewbank Victoria 3084 Australia
Subject: Funding & WEIGHT AND MEASURES
Comment: Kevin,
For years I have promoted the creation of the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN albeit neither the federal government or any state government really showed any interest in the project. Then when I announced on 18 May 2009 via email to proceed myself to set this up the Centre for Human Rights on 19 may 2009 then registered “Http://www.officeoftheguardian.com” seemingly at to undermine my work as a CONSTITUTIONALIST. As such abusing and misusing its funding for ulterior purposes. QUOTE http://www.godaddy.com/domains/searchresults.aspx?ci=13664 Administrative Contact: Human Rights, Centre domain-clients@freedbms.net Centre For Human Rights POBox M49 Marrickville South, New South Wales 2204 Australia 61295586231 END QUOTE . Hence I use the hyphens in the title as an alternative. . Today launching the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN (albeit its internal structure is still being worked upon) you can have the luck to be provided with its very first statement. Considering the tens of millions of dollars on outstanding fines all now subject to being questionable to their validity due to the non-compliance with Commonwealth legislation obviously will so to say cost the States/Territories a lot more then had they long ago taken it more serious to set up the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN. . The OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN will (as is intended) set up education facilities so that all politicians, lawyers (including judges) and others will be able to learn about the true meaning and application of the Constitution. . Hence, my request hereby to provide funding for this. . It ought to be clear it doesn’t serve either the Commonwealth and or the States/Territories to pursue conduct that turns out to be unconstitutional and for this the cost of funding the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN, a constitutional council, to advise the Government, the People, the Parliament and the courts as to constitutional powers and limitations would be a far better way to pursue. . HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-this Constitution is to be worked under a system of responsible government END QUOTE And QUOTE Mr. BARTON.- We have simply said that the guarantee of the liberalism of this Constitution is responsible government, and that we decline to impair or to infect in any way that guarantee. END QUOTE And QUOTE Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been made by the Parliament of the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but not true in effect, because the provisions of this Constitution, the principles which it embodies, and the details of enactment by which those principles are enforced, will all have been the work of Australians. END QUOTE And QUOTE Mr. BARTON.- Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people. END QUOTE Again; “therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people.” Clearly the need for the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN has been demonstrated time and again. . I now quote the email and the correspondence to Premier John Brumby; QUOTE Email 09-05-29 See attachment; 090529-02-WEIGHT AND MEASURES Friday, 29 May, 2009 3:58 PM From:
See attachment; 090529-02-WEIGHT AND MEASURES . Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka . 29-5-2009 . MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia Ph (International) 61394577209
"CONSTITUTIONALIST" and Author of books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series on certain constitutional and other legal issues. . EITHER WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION OR WE DON'T!
"JUSTICE IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER AND CLOUDED BY HIS/HER SIGHT DEFICIENCY" . END QUOTE Email 09-05-29 . QUOTE correspondence 090529 Premier John Brumby & TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN 29-5-2009 John.brumby@parliament.vic.gov.au . John,, I received various emails headed “Major speeding fine breakthrough!” but there appears to me to be a misconception as to what is or isn’t applicable. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900(UK) provides in Subsection 51(xv) “weights and measures”, and this means that therefore any weight and measures legislation only is valid if enacted through the Federal Parliament, other then any colonial weight and measures legislation that still exist unaltered since federation and/or any State/Territorial weight and measures that were enacted prior to the Commonwealth of Australia legislating for it and then only for so far it doesn’t conflict with any Commonwealth existing weight and measures legislation. . Hansard 22-9-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention) QUOTE The Hon. R.E. O'CONNOR (New South Wales)[3.18]: The moment the commonwealth exercises the power, the states must retire from that field of legislation. END QUOTE . Hansard 2-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. OCONNOR.-Directly it is exercised it becomes an exclusive power, and there is no doubt that it will be exercised. QUOTE The decision of Aggregate Industries UK Ltd, R (on application of) v English Nature and & Anor [2002] EWHC 908 (Admin) (24th April, 2002) and Judgments – Mark (Respondent) v. mark (Appellant), OPINIONS, OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL for judgment IN THE CAUSE, SESSION 2005-06 [2005] UKHL 42 on appeal from [2003] EWCA Civ 168 the Court had to consider if the weight and measures of the European Union did override English legislation. The Court held that in view the British parliament had been a party to the signing of the European Union’s Constitution then all and any European Union legislation (within its legislative powers) would override British legislation, and is therefore a clear example that the colonies having accepted the compact of federation by this are bound to the national weight and measures legislation by the Commonwealth and since the Commonwealth commenced to legislate it became exclusive Commonwealth legislative powers and the States/Territories by this no longer could legislate in that regard. In my view it is an error to hold that somehow the States still can legislate in this area of weight and measures as it is now exclusive Commonwealth legislative power. As such, it appears to me as a CONSTITUTIONALIST that all State/Territorial measuring equipments such as radar (speed measurement) devices would be without legal validity if not conforming to federal legislative provisions. The OFFICE-OF THE-GUARDIAN seeks to facilitate a better understanding regarding constitutional powers and its application and limitations. . Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka (GUARDIAN) END QUOTE correspondence 090529 . Hansard 19-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS: This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community ought to be able to understand. END QUOTE . It is ironic perhaps that so many perceive Iran to be backwards yet they have a system that no legislation comes before the parliament unless first approved by the constitutional council. More then one hundred years after federation not even 7 judges of the High Court of Australia can agree upon what the constitution stands for which underlines the need for the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN to train even those judges who are ought to understand it all! . I am looking forwards to your funding cheque as after all considering what was sent overseas, etc (about $40 million) it seems to me the funding of the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN would be a more vital issue as this after all can avoid, in various ways, a lot of waste of taxpayers moneys. . Gerrit . Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka (GUARDIAN) . OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN . 29-5-2009
---------------------------------------------------------------------- END QUOTE 29 May 2009 email
OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN
YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IS NOT TO BE COMPELLED TO VOTE!
Time and again there are articles by the media about the objection to vote compulsory yet they have ongoing for years on end failed to report the epic legal battle that went on between the Crown and myself concluding in a comprehensive defeat of the Crown in regard of its charges FAILING TO VOTE, on 19 July 2006 in the County Court of Victoria.
In my view the media neglected its duty towards the general community to inform it of relevant information at hand.
.
Despite of the comprehensive defeat I caused upon the Crown, Banyule City Council now seeks nevertheless to pursue me for FAILING TO VOTE.
.
Obviously, this upsets my 76-year old wife as she views that once I comprehensively defeated the crown after a 5-year epic legal battle then surely this should have been the end of it and Banyule City Council and others should be bound by this decision. In my view, Banyule City Council is committing CONTEMPT OF COURT by disregarding the courts decision and I view the Courts should not tolerate this and deal with the CEO and others for this.
.
.
Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step, not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any arbitrary act or wrong they may do,in the same way as any private person would be.
END QUOTE
. I view the CEAO and others acting for Banyule City Council having been notified about the 19 July 2006 County Court of Victoria decision cannot disregard this and continue their harassment and stalking upon me but have an obligation to establish what the 19 July 2006 decision was about first of all so as not to act in blatant defiance of the orders.
.
It is not relevant if the State government may have in place certain legislative provisions as I proved that even the Commonwealth legislative provisions were ULTRA VIRES as they were unconstitutional and so without legal force.
.
More over, where neither the Crown in right of the Commonwealth or in rights of the states challenged the 19 July 2006 decision, which was also an elaborate constitutional battle, then they all are bound by it and all and any fines and other cost charged against any elector for allegedly failing to vote in my view was fraudulently pursued as the Crown had an obligation to adhere to the 19 July 2006 decision.
.
What was before the Court at the time in fact was published on 6-7-2006 in;
INSPECTOR-RIKATI ®& What is the -Australian way of life- really?
A book on CD on Australian political, religious & other rights
ISBN 978-0-9751760-2-3
.
Which in “CHAPTER 03 NOT VOTING IN BANANA REPUBLIC” had reproduced all relevant material that were before the Court, and a copy of this book was filed as evidence for the 19 July 2006 hearing.
As such, Banyule City Council and so its CEO and those others acting for it, cannot excuse themselves that they are not aware of what was before the Court as first of all it is their business to sort out what the case was about as to avoid to defy a court ruling and secondly having been notified by me they cannot disregard this either but are bound to consider this appropriately.
.
Let make it very clear I am not opposed to electors voting but I am opposed first of all against unconstitutional COMPULSORY VOTING as the Framers of the Constitution specifically denied this power to compel anyone to vote, as I placed before the County Court of Victoria on 19 July 2006.
.
Further, I also then challenged the validity of municipal councils to be “local governments” and as such a municipal council can only hold elections for the purpose of electing councillors for municipality but not to hold elections for councillors for “local government” because constitutionally “local government” is the State government and within Section 106 of the constitution the States are bound by the principles embedded in the constitution.
.
As such, Banyule City Council and neither any other municipal council has a legal standing to litigate in that regard and any orders it purported to obtain through some crooked legal system would be null and void, because the Crown is bound by the DIRECT and COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL those arose of the 19 July 2006 decision of the County Court of Victoria, which being an order in federal jurisdiction therefore applies THROUGHOUT THE COMMONWEALTH.
Where then municipal councils are not constitutionally recognised as a level of government then by this it would fall in the federal jurisdiction challenging its “LEGAL STANDING” to litigate and as such by this bound also by the 19 July 2006 decision of the County Court of Victoria.
The fact that the Victorian Electoral Commission on behalf of Banyule City Council pursues matters makes not one of iota difference because where Banyule City Council has no constitutional standing to hold elections for “local government” then its purported agents neither can have any legal standing, regardless what the State Parliament may have legislated in that regard.
37 Am Jur 2d at section 8 states, in part: "Fraud vitiates every transaction and all contracts. Indeed, the principle is often stated, in broad and sweeping language, that fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters, and that it vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments."
And
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it. . .
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, 1998 version, Section 203 (formerly Section 256)
.
As the High Court of Australia in Wakim HCA 27 of 1999 made clear anyone is entitled to disregard a unconstitutional court order.
.
Therefore, Banyule City Council better be careful they do not persist with the harm they are causing, and so also upon my wife by this, as the CEO may just discover he has no immunity for persistently disregarding the 19 July 2006 County Court of Victoria decision.
.
I placed my cases before the court and the Court adjudicated in my favour against the Crown and as such I am entitled to be without ongoing harassment and if the CEO of Banyule city Council has a problem to understand/comprehend this then he should in my view resign and have a more competent person performing the job.
.
This was an epic legal battle where the might of the Crown was totally and comprehensively defeated on all constitutional issues I raised during the trial and I view every municipal council, state government and also the Commonwealth is bound to accept the decision of the court and not only never again harass any elector about FAILING TO VOTE but also refund all fraudulently obtained fines and other cost.
.
It should be understood that when one makes a constitutional challenge against the validity of legislation then where a court upholds this then the purported legislation never was and as such all fines and other cost since the purported legislation was enacted are refundable to the persons so fined, etc.
.
Take for example Derryn Hinch who I understand refuses to vote because of it may compromise his position. I have no issue with his refusal to vote because he is entitled to do so I have however an issue with that he then was fined to vote where he did no more but exercise his constitutional rights! Hence, he should have refunded all fines and other cost levied against him over the years.
.
The issue isn’t if he care less about getting the monies back but that if it was unconstitutionally obtained from him then it should be paid back, even if he was to have it instead donated to a children hospital or whatever.
.
The same is with the coco pop unconstitutional taxation that was obtained. The Framers of the constitution made clear that if a tax was levied unconstitutionally then the Commonwealth would be bound to refund it. The Commonwealth therefore cannot legislate otherwise to keep the monies but must refund it. If companies who had paid the tax do not regard being entitled to it because they in turn had charged their customers for it then they can always donate it to a children hospital or other charity organization. It does however also underline that the commonwealth never should levy taxation through an intermedia because it should only levy taxes of which it keeps records. The GST also is unconstitutional and neither does the ATO keep records who paid what, but that is another issue I have extensively published already in my books that were published in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series on certain constitutional and other legal issues.
.
Lets make it very clear the Commonwealth cannot raise taxes on behalf of the States because either it has the legislative powers or the States, not both. As such GST is being raised as a Commonwealth power and it is unconstitutional because it refers to more then two different items being taxed.
.
Getting back however to the issue of VOTING, it should be understood that no elector can be bound to vote in any kind of election! Further, this means no one can ever be fined for failure to vote.
.
The Australian Electoral Commission who actually instituted at the time the litigation against me and was totally defeated nevertheless disregards the courts ruling and this also underlines that the Australian electoral commission is not impartial to conduct fair and proper elections but are a stooge for the Government to fraudulently conduct elections. After all if people were not unconstitutionally forced to vote then the election results might be differently.
.
Likewise do I hold that the square above the line (on ballot papers) in elections is unconstitutional, albeit I am well aware of the High Court of Australia decision in the Abbott case, because the High Court of Australia in its decision totally disregarded the principles embedded in the constitution in that regard. This is also why the OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN (See http://www.office-of-the-guardian.com (Don’t forget the hyphens!) is to address this and numerous other constitutional issues.
.
EITHER WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION OR WE DON’T!
.
The rule of law applies as much to the governments and those working for it as it applies to anyone else.
.
EITHER WE HAVE A RULE OF LAW OR WE DON’T!
.
It should also be understood that where there is a religious objection to vote provided for then this would be unconstitutional unless it includes secular objections. This too was well canvassed by me before the courts and indeed so successfully.
As such, anyone who objects for whatever reason on that basis also can refuse to vote(apart of not being compelled to do so) because the mere objection to vote is sufficient in that regard without any need to explain the grounds of objection.
Tuesday June 9, 2009 MAD AS HELL!!! By Nick McCallum It's the most un-democratic oddity in our democracy... compulsory voting. I have just been fined for not voting in our local council election and I'm mad as hell and not going to take it anymore! It's just plain ludicrous. Last November I received a pamphlet in the mail introducing council candidates and outlining their policies. The candidates were drab and uninteresting, their policies the usual motherhood stuff of 'upgrading services' and 'sustainable development.' Boring, meaningless drivel. I followed the campaign in the local paper. None of them appealed to me. None, I thought, deserved my vote. So on election day, I did not turn up at a polling booth. I did not vote. I think what I did was democratic, but it was illegal. My wife turned up to a booth, knowing little about the candidates and cast a donkey vote. She wrote a number beside each name 1 to 8 from top to bottom. Her vote and those of so many like her who did not even know what the candidates stood for would have affected the result. I think what she did was undemocratic, but it was legal. This week I received a 57 dollar fine from the Electoral Commission for not voting. What a joke! In a grown-up, modern western-style democracy like Australia there should be a right to vote and a right NOT to vote if you don't support any of the candidates or their policies in any election whether it be Federal, State or Local. Australia is the only western democracy that has compulsory voting. America doesn't. Britain doesn't. Even New Zealand doesn't! In those countries candidates have to go out on the hustings and court voters, capture their imaginations, and entice them to the polls with good policies. Wouldn't that be nice here? Some will say... well you don't HAVE to vote in Australia. You can just go into the polling booth, get your name ticked off and leave . The point is in a democracy you shouldn't have to go through that charade. Some will say... in America voter turnout is often poor. Well, there it's made worse because of a silly tradition of holding elections on Tuesdays, so voting clashes with work. Fortunately we avoid that problem by holding our elections on Saturdays. Much more sensible. For the record, I did vote in the last Federal election. I supported the Carers' Party because carers are the unsung and unappreciated heroes of our society. Candidates' appearances on TV and in papers about the plight of their families were heart wrenching. They did what political candidates should do... they captured the imagination of a voter and won his vote. Legal experts say compulsory voting is not enshrined in the constitution, so we don't need a referendum to get rid of it. It's a matter of one of our political parties having the guts to adopt a policy of dumping compulsory voting and then getting it through parliament. Now that's a party I WOULD vote for.
Now Banyule City Council is pursuing me for not voting and I have made clear they cannot overrule the court order. This email doesn’t allow me to set it all out and so see my blog that details it extensively but laws that are unconstitutional are no laws at all and can be ignored. The issue is however who has the stamina and endurance to litigate for 5 years and to defeat the Crown! I did, as I stand up for my constitutional rights! That is the real issue! See also my books published in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series on certain constitutional and other legal issues.
.
Do understand that laws that are unconstitutional are not laws at all and have no legal force! Hence laws governing compulsory voting that are unconstitutional are no laws at all!
.
.
Again, I defeated the Crown in court previously and yet the media never covered this! Why not?
.
If you really are mad as hell then I expect you and others finally to expose this and publish it.
Why not follow up my battle with Banyule city council if they are to succeed against me despite of the 19 July 2006 County Court of Victoria ruling? Then again, a magistrate has no judicial powers to overrule a County Court decision!
.
The real issue is if one has the stamina and determination to stand up for your constitutional and other legal rights. I have but have you?
Your comments have been passed along to the right people - so thank you once again for your feedback.
.
THE EVIDENCE OF THE 19 JULY 2006 DECISION
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on VCAT as a STAR CHAMBER & KANGAROO COURT-No1
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on VCAT as a STAR CHAMBER & KANGAROO COURT-No1 A Book on DVD about the injustice upon Mr Francis James ColosimoISBN 978-0-9803712-7-7 . (Please note; Pending litigation it is anticipated this book is to be published in June 2009 but can be later)
.
This is a book exposing the scandalous conduct of VCAT (Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal) towards Mr Francis James Colosimo involving numerous lawyers also. How Moorabool Shire Council aided by their solicitors MADDOCKS LAYWERS pursued VEXATIOUS litigation in VCAT against Mr Francis James Colosimo and Her Honour Harbison J at least held some 5 CONTEMPT hearings making known she could imprison Mr Francis James Colosimo allegedly for breaching VCAT orders, this even so she never had formally charged him and neither advised him of his legal rights. This is a person who is a Judge of the County Court of Victoria! One may ask, what is her position to act within the powers of persona designata for the State government where she is a Judge of the County Court of Victoria who is supposed to be and so to be seen as being IMPARTIAL as a judicial officer? On 16 March 2009 I was requested to assist Mr Francis James Colosimo in the 6th hearing before Harbison J and submitted then that Her Honour Harbison J had no powers to do anything! In the end she, so to say, caved in and ordered a PERMANENT STAY of the CONTEMPT proceedings.
.
I pursue a JUDICIAL INQUIRY in to what I view was a CONSPIRACY TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE.
.
It should be understood that not only did VCAT never have jurisdiction and never invoked JURISDICTION but also Moorabool Shire Council by way of notice within section 116 of the Act dated 7 and 17 January 2007 had acknowledged that in fact Mr Francis James Colosimo acted within the provisions of the Building Act 1993 and the Building Regulations 2006 and also within the provisions of the Infringement Act 2006 only a Magistrates Court had jurisdiction!
.
In my view there was an elaborate CONSPIRACY to PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE and we have to consider the following to hold that nothing less then an INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL INQUIRY is required to ascertain what, if any criminal offences were committed.
.
If the STANDING and INTEGRITY of VCAT is indeed so important as to try to justify a term of imprisonment for up to 5-years for Mr Francis James Colosimo then I view at the very least the same must be applied against those who may have deceived Her Honour Harbison J and other members of VCAT.
.
The following quotations should be considered with the fact that both Moorabool Shire Council and their solicitors MADDOCKS LAWYERS knew or should have known that Mr Francis James Colosimo had done no legal wrong and the orders were issued without jurisdiction as well as that they concealed relevant details from Her Honour Harbison J and other members of VCAT!
.
QUOTE (AGAIN) 10-4-2009 CORRESPONDENCE
Foster(1950) S.R. (N.S.W.) 149, at p151 (Lord Denning, speaking on the role of an advocate)
QUOTE
"As an advocate he is a minister of Justice equally with a judge, A Barrister cannot pick or choose his clients...He must accept the brief and do all he honourably can on behalf of his client. I say 'All he honourably can' because his duty is not only to his client. He has a duty to the court which is paramount. It is a mistake to suppose that he is a mouthpiece of his client to say what he wants: or his tool to do what he directs. He is none of those things. He owes his allegiance to a higher cause. It is the cause of truth and Justice. He must not consciously misstate the facts. He must not knowingly conceal the truth. He must not unjustly make a charge of fraud, that is, without evidence to support it. He must produce all relevant authorities, even those that are against him. He must see that his client discloses, if ordered, all relevant documents, even those that are fatal to his case. He must disregard the specific instructions of his client, if they conflict with his duty to the court."
END QUOTE
Again;
QUOTE
He must see that his client discloses, if ordered, all relevant documents, even those that are fatal to his case.
END QUOTE
.
Ms Foley, as recorded in the transcript of 29 May 2008 before Her Honour Harbison J at page 57 at line 17;
QUOTE
It is submitted the contempt of the tribunal in this case is a serious matter. It’s not trivial or minor. The contempt has not been inadvertent or unintentional, but has been wilful. The council has spent a great deal of time, effort and the funds of ratepayers in an effort to bring the land into conformity with the scheme.
END QUOTE
Ms Foley, as recorded in the transcript 14 February 2008 at page 25 Ms Foley at 25 to page 26 line 2;;
QUOTE
Paragraph 54, I submit the fact that the tribunal is a statutory tribunal required by s.98 of the Act to conduct itself with little formality and technicality as possible should not be regarded as a licence to disregard the authority of the tribunal and to ignore compliance with its orders. If there’s some sort of suggestion that they’re somehow lesser authority because they don’t come from a court I would submit that that should not be the approach that’s adopted.
END QUOTE
Ms Foley, as recorded in the transcript 14 February 2008 at page 26 Ms Foley at 7
QUOTE
I submit that the status and integrity of the judicial and administrative structures upon which our society depend upon, respect for authority for the law and the orders made pursuant to those laws. Council submits that it’s important the tribunal’s contempt powers are used in appropriate occasions to preserve the authority and standing of the tribunal.
END QUOTE
Ms Foley, as recorded in the transcript of 29 May 2008 before Her Honour Harbison J at page 57 at line 17;
QUOTE
It is submitted the contempt of the tribunal in this case is a serious matter. It’s not trivial or minor. The contempt has not been inadvertent or unintentional, but has been wilful.
END QUOTE
Again;
QUOTE
the fact that the tribunal is a statutory tribunal required by s.98 of the Act to conduct itself with little formality and technicality as possible should not be regarded as a licence to disregard the authority of the tribunal and to ignore compliance with its orders.
END QUOTE
THE SAME APPLIES TO PROPER LEGAL STANDARDS in particular regarding the rights of an unrepresented Defendant facing up to 5-years imprisonment. Well indeed let this be applied but now against Ms Foley herself and her instructing solicitors and their clients. As well as VCAT itself as; What is good for the goose is good for the Gander.
END QUOTE 10-4-2009 CORRESPONDENCE
.
Therefore, where it now turns out that Mr Francis James Colosimo actually had done no legal wrong and Moorabool Shire Council and its solicitors MADDOCKS LAWYERS, as I view it CONSPIRED to PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE then criminal prosecutions are not only desired but warranted.
.
I understand that Mr Francis James Colosimo desires to seek about $10 million compensation and quite frankly I view he should be entitled to every cent because of what they did to this man and the manner they did it.
.
One also may question the conduct of the Office of the Public Advocate to be involved in the case and did nothing at all to expose this or not being aware of this rot! Likewise so Victorian Legal Aid who refused to assist!
.
One also has to question the conduct of State Trustees Limited to have a document signed on behalf of Mr Francis James Colosimo in fragrant breach of the 27 January 2009 orders!
.
While by way of the 27 January 2009 pronounced orders the files should have been provided to me upon my written request (I made on 28 January 2009) nevertheless since then the files have been implicatively refused to be provided seemingly as to obstruct the course of justice to prevent me to further expose rot that went on.
.
Further, despite a request to correct within the slip rule the incorrectly 27 January 2009 sealed orders this too was ignored/refused.
.
As to the mentality of VCAT might be shown that on 13 March 2009 I provided an email to Mr David Harbison associate of Her Honour Harbison J and subsequently phoned him to adjourn the 16 march 2009 CONTEMPT hearing as was indicated by senior VCAT member Ms Preuss on 27 January 2009 (upon my submission) only for Mr David Harbison to make clear that even if Mr Francis James Colosimo was in hospital the CONTEMPT proceedings would nevertheless go ahead! And on 20 march 2009 Mr Francis James Colosimo attended with heart complaints to the hospital!
.
While since my commencement to expose matters the State government has sought the President of VCAT to review its operations I do not accept for a moment that so to say this rot should be swiped under the carpet. The must be an INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL INQUIRY!
.
One has to ask how many other persons are likewise subjected to abuse and misuse of the legal processes, if one can call it “legal processes” at all!
.
While Justice Bell the President of VCAT may claim that there is an improvement in VCAT, well I do not consider the holding of VEXATIOUS CONTEMPT proceedings against an innocent person to be an improvement. If a judge considers this to be an improvement then I hate to find out what it was before this!
.
EITHER WE HAVE THE RULES OF LAW OR WE DON’T!
.
EITHER WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION OR WE DON’T!
.
As a CONSTITUTIONALIST I for one do not accept this rot to be allowed to occur in any court or Tribunal and I seek others to join me in exposing this kind of rot.
.
The book will be issued with copies of actually documentation provided to others regarding the case and it also deals extensively with other relevant issues such as FEE SIMPLE, CITIZENSHIP, companies cannot operate as courts, etc.
.
The Author’s views are that while there is nothing wrong to hold elections for councillors of a municipal council it is another thing when municipal councils are trying to operate as another level of government, as constitutionally they never were another level of government. Constitutionally the Federal government was held to be the “central government” and the State government was held to be the “local government” and municipal councils were precisely that and not a level of government at all.
.
This book makes a journey into the historical issues regarding the Queensland constitution and the unconstitutional amendment to abolish its upper house, etc.
.
One may have to consider if a municipal council is not a level of government then where is its validity of issuing infringement notices? Indeed considering the STAR CHAMBER COURT prohibition in the Imperial Act Interpretation Act 1980 (Victoria) then where is the legal validity of issuing “Infringement notices”?
.
Soon I will also provide people with an opportunity, on this website, if they desire to do so, to also order for purchase T-shirts and caps (hats) with MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® trademark upon it. Allow at least 4-weeks delivery in regard of orders.
.
Both Membership Card and Honourable Membership Cards both in regard of INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® are in the process of being printed/delivered.
.
We, the people, must reclaim our constitutional and other legal rights and hold lawyers/judges and politicians accountable.
.
.
Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates(Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the people, through their representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution. There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people.We have provided for a Judiciary, which will determine questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are bound to serve.What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
END QUOTE
.
The following will also make clear that the Framers of the Constitution intended to have CIVIL RIGHTS and LIBERTIES principles embedded in the Constitution;
HANSARD 17-3-1898Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. CLARK.-
for the protection of certain fundamental rights and libertieswhich every individual citizen is entitled to claim that the federal government shall take under its protection and secure to him.
END QUOTE
.
HANSARD18-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates(Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)
QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
The right of a citizen of this great country, protected by the implied guarantees of its Constitution,
END QUOTE
.
Thomas Jefferson:
.
QUOTE
"The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.".
END QUOTE
.
Let us not permit our governments (both State and federal) to do the same upon us!
.
Again:
.
EITHER WE HAVE THE RULES OF LAW OR WE DON’T!
.
EITHER WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION OR WE DON’T!
.
.
Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
.
9-5-2009
BANANA REPUBLIC OF AUSTRALIA
A book you cannot afford to miss out on reading!
RECOMMENDATION The best way to read this page is first to download it onto your computer.
Then copy and past the content into a Microsoft Word document.
Please note; At the end of this page there is an ability to purchase copies of this and any other book on CD listed. Do note that Postage includes a postage charge applies within the Commonwealth of Australia via "Australia Post" (including its agents Australia Post may engage). When placing an order, you may having placed the order forward an additional email to inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au as a special notification, however this is not required if you do not desire to do so. It is important to provide all relevant details as to postal address for delivery when placing the order(s).
STRENGTH AND COURAGE
This page is dedicated to the late JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE Aust CP Eng and to my wife Mrs Olga HLAVKA-SCHOREL.
As Author, creator, and publisher, of the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® book on CD series I pursue JUSTICE for all.
"Our lives are worthless without another human being there to share it with. Therefore, we ought to look after each human being as we do after ourselves."
By; G. H. SCHOREL-HLAVKA 6-8-2003
The National Library of Australia (Canberra) and the State Library of Victoria are keeping copies of published books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® book on CD series!
Read documents such as "The Constitution is a PERPETUAL LEASE", "The Great Deception" and other documents to become aware how collectively parliamentarians and judges of the High Court of Australia have robbed us of our constitutional rights by substituting the Constitution with a fake Constitution! A must to read!
On 19 July 2006 the County Court of Victoria ordered that my appeals would be allowed and the convictions of 17 November 2005 by the Magistrates Court of Victoria at Heidelberg were set aside and the charges for FAILING TO VOTE in the 2001 and 2004 (purported) federal elections were struck out.This as I maintained that the writs of the purported 10 November 2001 federal election were defective and so the purported election was without legal force and John Howard and his cronies were in fact not elected at all. I also made clear that the Framers of the Constitution refused to make voting compulsory and therefore it was unconstitutional to force anyone to vote in federal elections. Further, one of the issues I raised was that the right of “religious” objection voting would be unconstitutional unless it included “secular” objections. Further, I pursued also that there is no such thing as an “Australian nationality” as we are and remain British nationals.
All constitutional issues raised by me in the 5-year legal battle were and remained unchallenged!
There was a lot more to it, as I have set out in my most recent 6-7-2006 published book; Some of the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series (published or intended to be published)
A book on CD, making litigation a more level playing field
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable)
(ISBN 0-9580569-7-8) After 1-1-2007; ISBN 978-0-9580569-7-7
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book includes examples of the usage of the ADDRESS TO THE COURT where a unrepresented party can still present a well set out case before the Court, and avoiding the judicial officer (Judge, etc) to prevent the unrepresented party to appropriately pursue his/her case.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & ADDRESS TO THE COURT 2nd Edition (check if available)
A book on CD, making litigation a more level playing field
RRP $55.00 + PH charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-5-6 was prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-5-4
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book is an updated version and includes examples of the usage of the ADDRESS TO THE COURT where a unrepresented party can still present a well set out case before the Court, and avoiding the judicial officer (Judge, etc) to prevent the unrepresented party to appropriately pursue his/her case.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & High Court as STAR CHAMBER COURT (check if available)
A book on CD about irregular proceedings
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-9-4 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-9-1
Brief set out of some main issues;
The Author in this book sets out how the High Court of Australia rather then operating as a Court of law ends up operating as a STAR CHAMBER COURT, using the transcript of proceedings to underline this.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & High Court of Australia as KANGAROO COURT (check if available)
A book on CD as to improper legal proceedings RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-8-6 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-8-4
Brief set out of some main issues;
The Author in this book sets out how the High Court of Australia rather then operating as a Court of law ends up operating as a KANGAROO COURT, using the transcript of proceedings to underline this.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & How to lawfully avoid voting (Book)
A book about Australia’s federal election issues & rights
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-3-X prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-3-0
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book has limited material in it as it does not have the extensive material as is on the CD version. However, in itself is still very good reading and does set out certain matters. It is a Black & White version of the book itself albeit the additional pages are to some extend also in colour.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & How to Lawfully Avoid Voting (Book-Colour) (check if available)
A Book about Australia's Federal Election Issues & Rights
RRP $50.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 978-0-9751760-9-2
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book has limited material in it as it does not have the extensive material as is on the CD version. However, in itself is still very good reading and does set out certain matters. The usage of colour in some of the text of the book as to bring out certain statements makes it unique in that regard.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & How to lawfully avoid voting (CD)
A book on CD about Australia’s federal election issues & rights
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable (ISBN 0-9751760-4-8 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-4-7)
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book includes the Court orders and other documents filed in the Court in the process of the Author succeeding in his quest that he was not legally required to vote. It includes the various documents filed in Court and the constitutional and other legal arguments used in the hearings over the 5-years that it was being litigated.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & There is no Government to go to war
A book on CD About Legal Issues Confronting Australia
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-5-1 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-5-3
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book sets out why there was no government to go to war. Let alone there was no constitutional authority to go to war! The Author goes into numerous constitutional and other legal details. The question being should John Howard and others involved in the unconstitutional war be held accountable before a Court of law for the mass murder, treason, treachery, human rights abuses, war crimes, and other offences!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really? (check if available)
A book in B&W on Australians political, religious & other rights RRP $50.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 978-0-9803712-0-8
Brief set out of some main issues;
While much is argued about "the Australia way of life" what should be attended to what is it constitutionally? After all, politicians can fabricate their own versions but surely what is relevant is what is constitutionally applicable. The author takes the reader on a journey and set out numerous issues. He attends to the religious and racial issues also.
This is a "Black and White" limited version which does not have all the material as included on the CD but still worth reading.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really? (check if available)
A book-colour on Australians political, religious & other rights
RRP $65.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 978-0-9803712-1-5
Brief set out of some main issues;
While much is argued about "the Australia way of life" what should be attended to what is it constitutionally? After all, politicians can fabricate their own versions but surely what is relevant is what is constitutionally applicable. The author takes the reader on a journey and set out numerous issues. He attends to the religious and racial issues also.
This is a version that has certain text in colour as to bring out the statements and which does not have all the material as included on the CD but still worth reading.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really?
A book on CD on Australians political, religious & other rights
RRP $200.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) ISBN 0-9751760-2-1 (prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-2-3
Brief set out of some main issues;
While much is argued about "the Australia way of life" what should be attended to what is it constitutionally? After all, politicians can fabricate their own versions but surely what is relevant is what is constitutionally applicable. The author takes the reader on a journey and set out numerous issues. He attends to the religious and racial issues also.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the BANANA REPUBLIC AUSTRALIA
Dictatorship & deaths by stealth- Preliminary book edition on CD
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-3-5 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-3-9
Brief set out of some main issues;
The author in this book sets out how the Commonwealth of Australia is really no more then a Banana Republic. Read also as to what was going on and how people were concerned by the actions of the Federal Government.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire (check if available)
Personalized crime/comedy novel on CD edition
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-0-0 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-0-8
Brief set out of some main issues;
Read the extraordinary events that involves INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and his fellow travellers through the journey of comedy and crime and the twist ending finish. A book you wish to read over time and again.
Will Martina be able to stay a virgin or will she be seduced and so by whom? This is a crime/comedy where the Author has published the book in versions where a person can have his/her name inserted instead of a certain character, just that it cannot be INSPECTOR-RIKATI®, as his name is excluded as such. But, would it not be nice to have a book with your own name as a character?
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire, GAME EDITION
Crime/comedy novel on CD edition RRP $20.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-2-7 Prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-2-2
Brief set out of some main issues;
Read the extraordinary events that involves INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and his fellow travellers through the journey of comedy and crime and the twist ending finish. A book you wish to read over time and again. Will Martina be able to stay a virgin or will she be seduced and so by whom? This is a version of the book where the board game is included. The board game is based upon the events of the book. The board game is unique as you can play it time and again and yet never know how you are going to end up in the game.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire-ORIGINAL EDITION
Crime/comedy novel on CD edition
RRP $15.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-1-9 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-1-5
Brief set out of some main issues;
Read the extraordinary events that involves INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and his fellow travellers through the journey of comedy and crime and the twist ending finish. A book you wish to read over time and again. Will Martina be able to stay a virgin or will she be seduced and so by whom?
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-6-X prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-6-0
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book goes in detail as to "CITIZENSHIP" and exposes some of the rot fed to the public by the Federal Government.It exposes that the lack of "CITIZENSHIP" affects all lawyers/judges/politicians, etc.
A book on CD about ELECTORAL AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHTS
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-1-3 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-1-6
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book goes in detail as to "CITIZENSHIP" and exposes some of the rot fed to the public by the Federal Government, as well as addresses the issue of electoral matters
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9751760-0-5 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9751760-0-9
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book includes the submissions made to the Crime and Misconduct commission, but somehow were seemingly left out by the CMC. The Author provides the evidence it was received, and wonders was this to avoid exposing Queensland Premier Peter Beattie, through the Government lawyers, having perhaps concealed from the Courts relevant material in the Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge litigation. It includes the 1-9-2003 correspondence that so much spilled out why the convictions were legally floored as the Queensland Court of Criminal Appeal subsequently used to overturn the convictions.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on the battle SCHOREL-HLAVKA v BLACKSHIRTS
For the quest of JUSTICE, in different ways. Book on CD.
RRP $25.00 + P&H charges (where applicable) (ISBN 0-9580569-4-3 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-4-6
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book is where it is the Author versus the BLACKSHIRTS and his involvement in court litigation. The Reader can explore what goes on in regard of the leader of the BLACKSHIRTS Mr. John Murray Abbott and some of other BLACKSHIRTS as well as police and lawyers involved. A behind the scene look with copies of court documents included, including transcripts of hearings. Look at what the Author achieved over a 13 year period versus the BLACKSHIRTS!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on IR WorkChoices Legislation (Book-CD)
A Book about the Validity of the High Courts 14-11-2006 Decision
RRP $30.00 + P&H charges (where applicable).
ISBN 978-0-9751760-6-1
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book takes a critical look upon the 14-11-2006 judgment and how the Author exposes the High Court of Australia having failed to balance its statements in a proper manner, basically cherry picking what they used, rather then providing balanced judgments that consider all relevant details, as well as to how lawyers appeared to conceal relevant matters from the Court. The Author pursues that the Amendment Act (WorkChoices legislation) is and remains unconstitutional. The book also sets out why he published the book on the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal DOOMSDAY on 27 May 2007!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on IR WorkChoices Legislation (Book-B&W) (check if available)
A Book about the Validity of the High Courts 14-11-2006 Decision
RRP $35.00 + P&H charges (where applicable)
ISBN 978-0-9751760-7-8
Brief set out of some main issues;
This book takes a critical look upon the 14-11-2006 judgment and how the Author exposes the High Court of Australia having failed to balance its statements in a proper manner, basically cherry picking what they used, rather then providing balanced judgments that consider all relevant details, as well as to how lawyers appeared to conceal relevant matters from the Court. The Author pursues that the Amendment Act (WorkChoices legislation) is and remains unconstitutional. The book also sets out why he published the book on the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal DOOMSDAY on 27 May 2007! However, this Black & White issue is limited in material versus the CD issue.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® on IR WorkChoices Legislation (Book-Colour) (check if available)
A Book about the Validity of the High Courts 14-11-2006 Decision
RRP $50.00 + P&H charges (where applicable)
ISBN 978-0-9751760-8-5
This book takes a critical look upon the 14-11-2006 judgment and how the Author exposes the High Court of Australia having failed to balance its statements in a proper manner, basically cherry picking what they used, rather then providing balanced judgments that consider all relevant details, as well as to how lawyers appeared to conceal relevant matters from the Court. The Author pursues that the Amendment Act (WorkChoices legislation) is and remains unconstitutional. The book also sets out why he published the book on the 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal DOOMSDAY on 27 May 2007! However, this is a colour version where certain statements are quoted in colours as to highlight them, albeit it is a limited version in material versus the CD issue.
: Postage & Handling (P&H) charges varies pending number of items, weight, size, manner of packing, manner of posting, eg, ordinary mail, secure mail, express mail, also destination, etc.Roughly, within the Commonwealth of Australia only, for a printed books to be forwarded by Australia Post is estimated a $12.00 P&H charge is to be added. For a book on CD to be forwarded by Australia Post is $7.00 P&H charge is to be added
Overseas deliveries P&H charges are to be determine differently, as rates varies considerably.
Do keep in mind that those marked with (check if available) may require a long delivery time period.
Unless payments have been received {including cheque(s) having been cleared} no items will be send out. For delivery times you may contact the publisher.
Please note that any payments (such as a cheque) must be made to (including PayPal account);
THE ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE AUST CPENG
(ABN 97144820620)
Cheques should be crossed and marked; "NOT NEGOTIABLE"Email to;
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® for THE ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE AUST CPENG publish INSPECTOR-RIKATI® books by Author Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka.
Please note, that special postal rates may apply where multiple order is placed, which may allow for a credit/refund, subject to the determination of the Publisher. Please note, that for postal addresses outside the Commonwealth of Australia the goods may attract higher postal charges and/or any other charges that the relevant Authorities may apply and obviously are to be paid at the time of the order being placed and/or prior to shipment. Hence, any prospective purchaser may inquire by email to the Publisher as to relevant postal charges in such cases. Any book on CD/DVD are for use with Computer using Microsoft Word, and are not music or playable CD's?DVD"s!
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & What is the -Australian way of life- really?
A book on CD on Australians political, religious & other rights
ISBN 978-0-9751760-2-3 was ISBN 0-9751760-2-1
Our youth of today are growing up with disrespect, as politicians are showing that it is all right to lie, to be deceitful, to murder innocent civilians. They just do it under the cover that we are being or might be attacked. Yes, it are the “TERRORIST” as they will make clear to anyone. Really? So, they bread by this home grown terrorism. It is for this we should hold parliamentarians who ignore the RULE OF LAW accountable. They must face the Courts for any crimes they commit. "Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a facist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they're being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country." Hermann Goering, Hitlers' Reich-Marshall, at the Nuremberg trials after WW2.
Time and again, there are issues arising which, I view, could have been avoided had we a more competent High Court of Australia, and had we an OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, a constitutional council, to advise the Government, the People, the Parliament and the Courts as to the proper application of constitutional powers and its limitations.
In my view, such OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN should exist in all legal jurisdictions, State and Federal. Constitutionally, this OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN could be established without interfering with current constitutional powers of anyone. It merely would enhance the protection of State rights and the rights of the people.
YES, WE KINDLY ACCEPT DONATIONS
Since 1982, I have conducted a special LIFELINE SERVICE under the slogan MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®, which at times also assisted people in their Court litigation. See also some of it set out below.
Since 2001 the ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HALVKA MIE AUST CPENG began to provide financial support, as until then I had to do so, often resulting in borrowing moneys from the bank to fund this. Since then, MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® has embarked upon the huge project to return constitutional rights to the people, exposing the abuse by politicians and judges alike to bit by bit rob Australians of their constitutional rights. We accept any financial support/donations, etc anyone wish to provide where in particular those for whatever reason not being able themselves to embark upon this hard work in research, etc, can nevertheless in their own way, by financial contribution support or otherwise assist this cause. In spirit of the Constitution, we do not seek to take any position in regard of political parties and/or the religion of any person. Our platform is that all people should be equal among their fellowman/woman, in the circumstances prevailing. We pursue the creation of an OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN, a constitutional council that advises the Government, the People, the Parliament and the Courts as to constitutional powers and limitations without any political bias. By this, we pursue that no longer a person having to forgo JUSTICE because of the huge cost to litigate a constitutional issues that might be a obstacle in litigation, but the OFFICE OF THE GUARDIAN being able to pursue this apart of what any person may desire to do personally. No longer politicians hiding behind lawyers, using taxpayers monies, to defeat innocent people, as we pursue JUSTICE for all. Some people are good in certain skills and some people in other skills, and why not do what you are best in and provide us the financial support to do what we have done for so long. Those who have faced the court may know how terrifying the experiences can be, and I created in 1985 the document "ADDRESS TO THE COURT", that since has been for more then 25 years used in all Court levels including civil and criminal trials. It is where the Defendant can set out his/her case to be heard by the Court without the judge being able to prevent the Defendant to do so, as too often occurs with unrepresented Defendants.
See also the 1-11-2003 published book;
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® & ADDRESS TO THE COURT
A book on CD, making litigation a more level playing field
ISBN 0-9580569-7-8 (After 1-1-2007; ISBN 978-0-9580569-7-7
Those who desire to have mention in any further book publication(s) his/her making of a donation may indicate so when making a donation and state if their amount of donation is to be included or not upon which the publisher considers what would be most appropriate. The person may forward an email to any change in this and we seek to provide for the intentions of any donor. As a donor you do what you are best in and we do our best in fighting for our (the general community) constitutional rights, justice, "civil rights", "human rights", etc.
On behalf of all those who directly and/or indirectly may benefit from your donation I thank you. Please note that corporate sponsorship is also welcome. Estate bequest are also welcome! Please note that the PayPal payment (PayPal also accepts credit card and VISA payments via email) is used so that the donors banking details remains confidential in every way, while it ensures accountability as to any monies donated. For those interested, the following book also sets out the ambition as to MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® as how it is anticipated to become global for the good of mankind; INSPECTOR-RIKATI® and the Secret of the Empire-ORIGINAL EDITION
Crime/comedy novel on CD edition
(ISBN 0-9580569-1-9 prior to 1-1-2007) ISBN 978-0-9580569-1-5
There are also Personalized and Game (board game) editions available.
Please note that any DONATION (such as by way of a cheque) must be made out to;
THE ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE AUST CPENG (ABN 97144820620)
Cheques should be crossed and marked; "NOT NEGOTIABLE"
Postal Address; 107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia.
Thank you. Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
YES, WE KINDLY ACCEPT DONATIONS
Please do understand that legal battles to pursueJUSTICE against politicians and judges are very costly that can be in hundreds of thousands of dollars. But, if we do not pursue to hold them accountable then slowly bit by bit we will have aDICTATORSHIP and then it might be too later to pursue JUSTICE. Once you successfully hold politicians/judges accountable others may get the warning signals not to do the same wrongdoings, hence we create a better society.
Also, we pursue for decent and appropriate conditions for the elderly in nursing homes, as currently many fear to go into nursing homes because of what is and has been going on. Those who have supported society through their lifetime in paying taxes should not be robbed of their dignity and an appropriate care to be provided in their later years of life.
Many people are left sleeping, even dying, under bridges, in parks, etc. We pursue to provide as many as possible with a decent lifestyle. By looking after our fellow citizens we make it better for ourselves.
There is much more we pursue to pursue JUSTICE, and those interested can always seek further information by forwarding us an email or contract us otherwise.
Again, you and your business can pursue to do the best in earning moneys and we will do our best to provide JUSTICE for all using the financial DONATIONS you provide to support us in our quest for JUSTICE.
Please note that any DONATION (such as by way of a cheque) must be made out to;
THE ESTATE OF JAROSLAV HLAVKA MIE AUST CPENG (ABN 97144820620)
Cheques should be crossed and marked; "NOT NEGOTIABLE"
